Automobile Law - Williams V. Geico - Wilkes-Barre, Scranton Personal Injury Lawyers

Resources » Blog

Automobile Law - Williams V. Geico

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in a case where a police officer was injured in the course and scope of his employment. The officer sought underinsured motorist coverage on his personal automobile insurance policy. The Superior Court, in a memorandum decision, held that he was not entitled to coverage due to a “regular use” exclusion in his policy. In the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the officer argued that he had no control over the employer-provided vehicle insurance and it was a violation of public policy to enforce the exclusion against a first responder.

The Court has certified the following question for appeal:

Whether, under the MVFRL and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision inBurstein v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 809 A.2d 204 (Pa.2002), the “regular use” exclusion to underinsured motorist coverage in an automobile insurance policy is valid where the insured is a police officer, who has sustained bodily injury in the course of performing his duties while driving a police vehicle, for which vehicle he could not have obtained underinsured motorist coverage.

Argument has been scheduled for April, 2010.

By Scott B. Cooper, Esq. (Pa. Justice News)

Blog (View All)

Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Super Lawyers